The "freedom" of women or the "freedom" of using women?
The "freedom" of women or the "freedom" of using women?
The many decisions being implemented by the Taliban government in Afghanistan are creating a great opportunity for some media outlets to further fuel suspicions about "women's freedom" in Muslim countries. What do these media outlets actually mean by women's freedom?
The way various media outlets and social media platforms trumpet "innocence" and "purity" in the issue of "women's freedom", and try to impose a Western image on representatives of various cultures, is clearly infuriating to anyone with an independent mind and a critical-analytical approach. In fact, women's freedom usually means something different. By women's freedom, they supposedly mean the freedom of men to enjoy the beauty of women's bodies, exploit them, and use them for all kinds of services, including marketing, and they act harshly and relentlessly in this direction. It cannot be denied that forcing women to take off their clothes is a pleasant process for a secular man. If men are given freedom when it comes to women, they will also have the opportunity to play with them to their heart's content.
The male-dominated market understands very well that the most profitable human interaction in the market is the physical attraction between the two sexes. They have exploited this attraction to make trillions of dollars. In this way, all the services of women are now freely available in the market. Their growing convergence brings enormous benefits to all types of markets, from clothing to the beauty industry, from hospitality to tourism, from media to entertainment products.
Men enjoy, women suffer
The ones who suffer from this "freedom" are still the women themselves and their children, although ultimately it is society as a whole that suffers. Women get pregnant, then have to abort their children, and if they are forced to give birth, they are left to take care of them as single mothers. While both men and women can contract sexually transmitted diseases, women are more likely to be diagnosed because of their anatomy. And they are the ones who are most easily victimized by crimes, including rape. Because of this freedom, sexually transmitted diseases remain a serious threat even in countries with the most advanced health care systems.
Over the past thirty years, more than thirty-eight million people have died from AIDS, and an estimated eighty million are still battling the disease. Yet, one million people die from AIDS every year, and this number is certainly much higher than in areas with greater "freedom." But the media never covers these deaths, lest the sex market suffer. Women and children suffer the most. The following is an excerpt from the WHO report's Abstract. This gives us some idea of what "Freedom" means from a gender perspective:
HIV/AIDS incidence and mortality rates among adults—excluding heterosexual transmission—are higher among men. Among children, AIDS rates are higher among boys than girls. For adults, due to heterosexual transmission, gender differences vary by time and place. In the United States, women outnumber men..."
According to another report from South Africa, "in the region (Central and Southern Africa), women account for 58 percent of people living with HIV. If this trend shows some change in Western countries, especially in Europe, it is due to the increase in homosexuality and the frequent use of drugs by men. Where women are involved, they suffer more.
Rape and brutally kill unborn children
Every year, 50-70 million babies are aborted by women, but no one talks about this cruelty to the unborn. Hundreds of thousands of cases of violence against women are committed, but no one talks about the real, underlying reasons, because these reasons are connected to large markets, including the market for alcohol and sex.
In order to increase the number of "rapes" in "more conservative" countries, they came up with a "brilliant" idea: to count complaints of violence by husbands against their wives as "rape." Nevertheless, America continues to lead the world in the number of rapes every year, while in countries like South Africa, more than a quarter of women have been raped.
Islamic restrictions on men, not women
In Muslim countries, especially in countries with Islamic legal systems such as Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar and the UAE, crime rates are actually much lower. Yet Islam is often criticized for being anti-women. They do not know, or pretend not to know, that the restrictions on women in the Islamic system are actually restrictions on men. Men are forbidden to enjoy women's bodies. Women want security wherever they are, and this is available in true Islamic systems. There they are much less likely to be raped and kidnapped, to become mistresses and prostitutes, to have forced abortions and even to divorce. Children are also safer in Islamic lands, as they are much less likely to have abortions, to live with single mothers or with unnatural and same-sex parents.
Freedom in style and freedom in results
If the world could distinguish between freedom of style and freedom of results, it would guarantee a safe and healthy existence for humanity. Unfortunately, freedom of style is more important to them, even though it ultimately harms freedom itself. Traffic restrictions are necessary to prevent accidents. If "freedom" is allowed on the roads, the result will be chaos. It is not surprising that the majority of deaths in traffic accidents are caused by drunk driving. Good results in technology also require a strict methodology. If society is to be protected from disease, crime, and disorder, there is no other option than to make the laws governing all types of behavior strict, letter by letter, article by article, and in practice.
