"We will either be a member of the resistance or a Zionist." Is it time to choose?

"We will either be a member of the resistance or a Zionist." Is it time to choose?

On September 28, it was announced that Sayyid Hasan Nasrullah, the leader of the Lebanese Hezbollah movement, had been killed. One of the users of the social network, who left his comment under this message, said, "Today sects have melted. There are only two options left for us: either we become members of the resistance or we become Zionists, vassalam!” he wrote.

September 28 It was announced that Sayyid Hasan Nasrullah, the leader of Lebanon's "Hezbollah" movement, was killed. The next morning, one of the Egyptian newspapers published a photo of Sukhandan announcing this news on its page. Sukhandan was looking at the black and white photo of the fallen commander, tears of mourning glistened on his cheeks.

One of the users of the social network, who left his comment under this message, said, "Today sects have melted. There are only two options left for us: either we become members of the resistance or we become Zionists, vassalam!” wrote that

These are not the only sounds that reflect our feelings in front of Israel's massacres. There are also other things we need to know. A recent experience made me think about this.

I was invited to a conference in one of the Arab countries. During this trip, I was surprised by the current situation while watching the news about Gaza through various news channels in the hotel. Here, the sources of information I wanted to follow were blocked. Live news broadcast was limited to only one TV channel.

I had no choice but to watch this channel for four nights. Surprisingly, all information and reports on this channel were covered from the Israeli point of view. The propagandists did not go beyond condemning the Palestinian resistance movement.

For this reason, when I returned to Cairo and began to freely watch other channels, I was reluctantly terrified. I felt as if I had moved from one world to another. Soon after, I noticed, as a result of my efforts and research, that Israel has a great influence in the international media arena. The damage caused by the pro-Zionist media to Muslims is so serious.

In fact, what scares me is not the abundance of such pulpits. Because we can imagine the real situation by comparing the information. On the contrary, the non-admission of other impartial information sources, the impossibility of parallel interpretation of data makes people subject to artificial political biases.

Here are some claims of arrogance and drunkenness: Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu never gets tired of pointing out that he has won the upper hand by dealing a heavy blow to the Muslims. Apparently, Netanyahu began to behave as if there was no force left in the world to stop and limit his atrocities. In addition, he does not hesitate to say that the map of the Middle East will be redrawn. There is no doubt that Netanyahu's "masculinity" is directly supported by American propaganda mechanisms. He continues to brag about the failure to achieve the strategic goals he announced after Operation Al-Aqsa. All the occupying forces could do was kill tens of thousands of innocent Palestinians and assassinate Ismail Haniya and Hassan Nasrullah with the help of traitors. In fact, the terrorist state that massacred about fifty thousand Muslims should be held seriously responsible by the international community. Another aspect is that these crimes were carried out directly with US technology and assistance.

Indeed, the assassination of the leader of the Shia movement, Sayyid Nasrullah, was a severe blow to the resistance movement. But "Hezbollah" was able to recover quickly from the impact of this loss. It soon came face-to-face with Israeli forces and targeted occupation military installations. In addition, Hezbollah's rocket attacks were directed not along the border, but within a hundred kilometers of Israeli territory.

Many Muslims cannot forget the Shia movement's aggression against Sunnis living in Syria and elsewhere. But at the moment, we should not forget that this team is helping Hamas and the Palestinians. In the same way, we can disagree with Iran on some issue, but it is inappropriate to blame the Persian state on the issue of Palestine. Especially at a time when the ummah is weakened and unable to provide meaningful assistance to its oppressed brothers...

In addition, Tel-Aviv has been telling the Arab world for decades that their real enemy is not Israel, but Iran. He also worked tirelessly to intensify the conflict between Sunnis and Shiites.

If we look at the other side of the issue, the fact that the Zionists were able to penetrate into the Shia movement greatly helps the occupation regime to commit crimes that it calls victory. A clear example of this is the events in Beirut, which has become Israel's testing ground for half a century.

At this point, Muslims should be grateful to Yahya Sinvar, the leader of the Hamas movement. Because Sinwar knew his enemy well in time, and in 1988 - before his arrest - he developed the movement's security system and attached great importance to cleansing the ranks of Muslims from traitors. This measure cut the hands of Hamas inside the Jewish state and ensured that the resistance movement would succeed in the most precarious situations.

It is well known that Israel is now ruled by the radical right. This is also confirmed by the fact that more than two hundred thousand weapons were distributed to the Jews of the West Bank by order of the Israeli Minister of National Security, Itamar Ben-Gvir, who is their face. Unfortunately, the Zionists were assisted in this by the forces of the Palestinian Authority.

As a result, attacks by Jewish radicals on Palestinian villages doubled. And the Israeli authorities do not hide from the public their thoughts about occupying the "promised land" from the Nile to the Euphrates. That is why the "Al-Aqsa Flood" operation shocked the "Torah" parties of Israel.

The invaders are researching and funding their secret plans. Currently, the Zionists have their eyes on the Gulf region and are pursuing a policy of alienating the people of the region from other Muslims in order to gain ownership of these lands.

This prompts us to look at the assassination of Hasan Nasrullah from a different angle. It is noteworthy that this assassination was organized almost a year after the Al-Aqsa flood, which destroyed Israel's military, strategic and intelligence capabilities and exposed the abomination of the moral image of the Zionists. During this time, the Palestinians fought hard against the invaders. This situation signaled the birth of a new generation that could threaten the existence of the Israeli terror state.

So the Nazis decided that the problem was not Hamas, but the existence of the Palestinians. They violated the Oslo Accords, canceled the agreement with Libya on the demarcation of mutual maritime borders and blocked all roads leading to reconciliation with the Palestinians. The fact that the political speeches of the Zionist officials do not talk about reaching an agreement between the two countries is also a sign of this.

Israel's genocide in Gaza, Rafah and the West Bank and the attack on southern Beirut are not the last phase of the Nazi invasion. They want to put Hezbollah out of power and silence the voices of resistance in Iraq and South Yemen. Iran is the last link in this chain, and striking it means cutting off the financial and military supply of the resistance. If this happens, it will not only harm the resistance forces, but also the end of Iran's nuclear program. As a result, there will be no call for unification and no punishment for Israel's crimes. As for the Arab world, it does not go beyond condemning some of the actions of the Zionists. But I am sure that if the invaders achieve their goal, the day of the Palestinians will also befall the Muslims in the Arab lands who are sitting as spectators today.

  Fahmy Huwaydi, Egyptian writer and journalist